Our sites:NesyonaHealth BritannicaceocultRxGrab

Open dataset · Canada Doses vs US Limits

Canadian Natural Health Product Recommended Doses vs US Upper Limits 2026: the open dataset behind the Canada vs US Dose Check

3,395 of 14,230 licences (24%) recommend a daily amount at or over the NIH adult limit for at least one of the ten nutrients; magnesium is the most common (1,237 of 4,708). Counts of what licences recommend, not of what anyone takes, and not a statement that any product is unsafe. Version 1.0. Every figure is reproducible from the files below; try it on your own case in the Canada vs US Dose Check.

This page describes version 2.0, which is built and awaiting deposit. The earlier version 1.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.24180566) is superseded and should not be used; the corrections record below says what changed. The files below carry this version's hashes and get their links when it is deposited.

What is in it?

The unit is the licence number. Health Canada's database holds one record per product name, and one licence can carry several names (one jar sold as "Vitamin C 1,000 mg", "Vitamin C" and "C 1000 mg" is one licence): 308,733 name records are 153,975 licences. Records of one licence are merged and every name is kept in the product_names column.

For 14,230 Canadian natural health product licences with a recommended adult dose that can be read as a number of tablets or capsules a day, the maximum daily amount of ten plain-mass nutrients (vitamin C, vitamin B6, calcium, iron, magnesium, zinc, copper, manganese, selenium, iodine) at the licence's highest recommended dose, and that amount as a share of the NIH adult upper limit (35,630 licence-nutrient rows).

How should it be read?

A licence is an authorisation to recommend, not a measure of intake. What each limit covers is in the limit_scope column of nutrient-summary.csv: for most of these nutrients the NIH limit is for total intake from food and supplements together, and for magnesium it is for supplemental magnesium only. One product is compared alone, so a share can be well under 100% for a product and still sit above a limit once everything else a person takes is added. A share above ten times the limit is flagged: it is more often a data-entry or unit issue in the licence record. About half of the licences listing these nutrients cannot be checked (liquids, powders, doses not stated per day) and are not in the counts.

What are the files?

The files will be hosted on Zenodo with the DOI. Each has a SHA-256 hash, so a downloaded copy can be checked against it.

FileSizeSHA-256 (first 16)
README.md5 KB90b3f39d9db39c4d
licence-nutrients.csv5.9 MB6bdef389ec8e7485
nutrient-summary.csv807 bytesfb5e6c09f3a644c9
not-checkable-reasons.csv2 KB7ce371a4c505b10b
data.json2 KBc9966dd5293698f6
control-result.json540 bytes30c27dc2d2eff994
PROTOCOL-CANADA-DOSE-VS-LIMIT-2026-11-12.md7 KB454f30cc7cc978f0
protocol.sha256110 bytesf9e55c2b744c1242
protocol.original.sha256110 bytesc075bc9f6b7c659b
code.zip36 KB514f2a011dc96cbb
SHA256SUMS.txt943 bytes

How was it checked?

The method was frozen before any figure was published, on 12 November 2026; its SHA-256 hash begins 454f30cc7cc978f0. A separate reader recomputed figures from the raw files: a random sample of 400 recomputed, 0 mismatches. Read how the Canada vs US Dose Check was checked, including what the check found and what it does not cover.

What is not claimed?

That any product is safe, unsafe, toxic or dangerous; that exceeding a US limit causes harm; any dose recommendation; any comparison with Canada's own reference intakes.

Has it been corrected?

Version 2.0 (13 November 2026) replaces version 1.0 (doi:10.5281/zenodo.24180566), which should not be used. Two defects, both found by comparing the published numbers with an independent count, are corrected. (1) The limit row: the method says the NIH adult limit at age 19, but the code matched the 14 to 18 year row for six nutrients (zinc, vitamin B6, vitamin C, manganese, copper, iodine), so those were compared with the teen limit while labelled adult. (2) The unit: version 1.0 counted product-name records as licences; one licence can carry several names, so 33,623 records were 14,230 licences. Version 1.0 also stated 3,656 of 33,623 licences at or over a limit, which divided distinct licences by name records and was wrong on any reading; the corrected figure is 3,395 of 14,230 licences (23.9%). The independent control had taken its limits from the builder's own output and sampled records, so it could not see either defect; it now re-derives the limits from the NIH tables, checks the licence count and samples licences. What changed:

NutrientLimit in v1.0Limit in v2.0Share at or over in v1.0Share at or over in v2.0
vitamin C1800 mg2000 mg7.9% of 14,8716.9% of 6,426
vitamin B680 mg100 mg13.6% of 10,80010.6% of 4,612
calcium2500 mg2500 mg3.7% of 8,6863.5% of 3,601
iron45 mg45 mg22.1% of 5,31019.5% of 1,899
magnesium350 mg350 mg27.6% of 11,56526.3% of 4,708
zinc34 mg40 mg18.3% of 12,94416.4% of 4,984
copper8000 mcg10000 mcg1.6% of 6,6690.9% of 2,580
manganese9 mg11 mg9.6% of 5,2193.5% of 2,144
selenium400 mcg400 mcg4.2% of 6,9255.0% of 2,896
iodine900 mcg1100 mcg2.7% of 4,2951.6% of 1,780

Control: 400 sampled licences, 0 problems against the raw tables, and the ten limits match the NIH tables.

How do I cite it?

Couey, V. W. (2026). Canadian Natural Health Product Recommended Doses vs US Upper Limits 2026: 14,230 Licences, Ten Nutrients (Version 2.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. (DOI assigned when this version is deposited)

Where does the data come from?

Health Canada, Licensed Natural Health Products Database open data (productlicence, productdose, medicinalingredient), downloaded 2026-11-12; NIH Office of Dietary Supplements Health Professional fact sheets (upper limits, adults 19 to 50). Compiled by Vincent Wesley Couey (ORCID 0009-0005-6869-308X). Tool: https://healthbritannica.com/tools/canada-vs-us-dose-check

Questions about this dataset

What is in the Canada Doses vs US Limits dataset?

For 14,230 Canadian natural health product licences with a recommended adult dose that can be read as a number of tablets or capsules a day, the maximum daily amount of ten plain-mass nutrients (vitamin C, vitamin B6, calcium, iron, magnesium, zinc, copper, manganese, selenium, iodine) at the licence's highest recommended dose, and that amount as a share of the NIH adult upper limit (35,630 licence-nutrient rows).

Can I reuse it?

Yes. The compilation is licensed CC BY 4.0: reuse it with credit, citing the DOI once this version is deposited. The underlying records keep the terms of their public source.

How was it checked?

The method was frozen and hashed before any figure was published (12 November 2026), and a separate reader recomputed figures from the raw files: a random sample of 400 recomputed, 0 mismatches. The full account is on the how-we-check page for the tool.

What does it not claim?

That any product is safe, unsafe, toxic or dangerous; that exceeding a US limit causes harm; any dose recommendation; any comparison with Canada's own reference intakes.

Compiled by Vincent Wesley Couey (ORCID 0009-0005-6869-308X).

☆ Save
Dashboard